away IS the objective;if that can't be done w/o hitting people, so be it.Assuming that's correct reading, how is it objectionable?
The best idea that @instapundit used "Run them down" to mean "keep driving [and don't hit them]" is, in a word, RISIBLE. cc @JuliusGoathttps://twitter.com/pokergrump/status/779104070242013185 …
-
-
-
2/3 not some less objectionable phrasing: "keep driving, don't aim for the protestors, but it's on them to get out of the way."
- 20 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Your bracketed words are not implied anywhere in this, by anyone. His point: Running people over is not the objective. But getting
-
His on words were that he wouldn't *aim* for the pedestrians, so I think my bracketed words are fair if not actually softer.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
See, when I said "shoot them in the head," I meant "avoid them and stay safe." And when I said "burn their houses down," I meant
-
Once again, conversation is all about how it's terrible to see protesters in the road and what to about it or (perhaps) to them.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.