Consider how different the NJ sports betting outcome would have been if the original Christie I panel had been assigned to Christie II.
That relies on questionable assumption CA3 wouldn't have granted en banc if PASPA ruled unconstitutional by Christie I panel.
-
-
Dan seems determined to keep NJ going, good luck with that Dan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.