@Grange95 one could make the case that someone you don't trust is just as bad as someone you disagree with
-
-
Replying to @SteveRuddock
@SteveRuddock Candidate A says he's on your side, but may sell out or flip-flop. Candidate B promises he's against you. Vote for ___?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveRuddock
@SteveRuddock A parliamentary system is far better at offering ranges of candidates. But our reality is a binary system.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveRuddock
@SteveRuddock@Grange95 If you want to protest then doing it through the medium of voting is about the nut worst way of doing so IMO1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gamblinglamb
@Poker_Hack
@Grange95 why? 1 election you get 2%, next 5-8%, after that who knows? Also, if late to convo, I'm playing devil's advocate3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @SteveRuddock
@SteveRuddock@Grange95 And usually depend on more mainstream elected officials to effect the change on their behalf.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gamblinglamb
@Poker_Hack
@SteveRuddock Political movements with support tend to be co-opted by a major party. We like to stay binary.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@SteveRuddock @Poker_Hack Think we can all agree our political system sucks. But we're stuck with it. #ThanksMadison
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.