@JFielkow Operators in *any* industry will prefer lighter regulations and lower taxes.
-
-
Replying to @Grange951 reply 0 retweets 1 like
-
Replying to @DustinGouker
@DustinGouker@JFielkow Let's see what Illinois DFS bill looks like when passed. If current form holds, expect it to be an outlier.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grange95
@Grange95@DustinGouker Maybe but bill already requires ops to shoulder most of burden (i.e. ops must contract w/3rd party to perform audit)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JFielkow
@Grange95@DustinGouker Ops then submit audit results to AG. Simple/cheap for the State, while still accomplishing consumer protection goals2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JFielkow
@JFielkow@DustinGouker AG then uses costs of reviews to request increased budget to be paid by ... licensing fees.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DustinGouker
@DustinGouker@Grange95 Right. I can understand minimal licensing fees to cover costs. Focus was more on onerous fees/heavy taxation3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@JFielkow @DustinGouker Agree that DFS regulation *could* be done with low fees/taxes. Cynic in me doubts most states will go that route.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.