@WALLACHLEGAL En banc can certainly overrule panel on direct appeal or in later case. But constitutional issue resolved for this case.
-
-
Replying to @WALLACHLEGAL
@WALLACHLEGAL Don't think NJ asked for en banc in Christie I. If not, may regret it this time.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WALLACHLEGAL
@WALLACHLEGAL That likely means law of the case doctrine forecloses review of Christie I issues in current appeal: http://www2.ca3.uscourts.gov/opinarch/124160np.pdf …2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WALLACHLEGAL
@WALLACHLEGAL Don't think CA3 IOP 9.1 speaks to law of the case doctrine. But there may be case law on that point.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @WALLACHLEGAL
@WALLACHLEGAL Maybe PA will legalize sports betting and fast track a new CA3 PASPA challenge. We can dream, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @WALLACHLEGAL
@WALLACHLEGAL Good point and good question.
10:48 AM - 1 Nov 2015
1 reply
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.