Listened to audio of 3d Circuit arguments in NJ sports betting case. Ted Olson & Paul Clement truly deserve their reps as master advocates.
@BillyPolcha 2/2 But both Olson & Clement had clear, strong theme from start and used great rhetoric to frame their arguments throughout.
-
-
@Grange95 I agree, both Olson & Clement were brilliant but Olson's argument was based on Commandeering which is a losing argument.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.