@realdawnsummers @Grange95 I remember this one! Right of habeas not suspended unless for public safety in an invasion or rebellion.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @realdawnsummers
@realdawnsummers@Grange95 different question. Then you're looking at the immunity standard for a section 1983 claim (or state equivalent).1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @realdawnsummers
@realdawnsummers I don't think municipalities can be sued under 1983. But may be anothrt basis to assert claim. (Consult a law butler.)3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alceste42
@realdawnsummers@alceste42 (2/2) policies, procedures or training led to rights violation. http://federalpracticemanual.org/node/49 & http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Elements+of+a+Section+1983+Claim …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@realdawnsummers @alceste42 Another good article on Section 1983 claims against municipalities: http://digitalcommons.tourolaw.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1227&context=lawreview …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.