@calpokerlaw I'm not categorically disagreeing, just saying it's not quite so clear-cut. Especially since Stars offered only poker.
@OPReport @calpokerlaw Why does "debate" require punting to regulators? Bad actor clause is a policy choice, not a fact-intensive inquiry.
-
-
@Grange95 Because the debate suggests to me an issue that requires extensive / nuanced weighing. I don't expect policymakers to do that. -
New conversation -
-
-
@Grange95 And because the debate suggests it's a complex decision that could have unanticipated consequences. Regulators have more flex.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.