decision that he could continue enforcing DOMA but not defend its constitutionality. That is an untenable position, and it caused this
-
-
Replying to @RandomlyBob
@RandomlyBob Wait so in both cases the Gov didn't want to defend their side?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @wndywitch
@wndywitch Both sides agreed that the trial court decision in favor of Windsor was correct. So there was no "case or controversy" thereafter2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RandomlyBob
@RandomlyBob Still "injury" from requirement for US to pay tax refund. But standing is ridiculously arcane area of law.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @RandomlyBob
@RandomlyBob Lot more complicated than that, but like most legal points, not easily reduced to Twitter post or media sound bite.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @wndywitch
@wndywitch Last year I argued lack of standing in an administrative law case. Took up ~25 pages of my brief.
5:03 PM - 26 Jun 2013
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.