decision that he could continue enforcing DOMA but not defend its constitutionality. That is an untenable position, and it caused this
@RandomlyBob Still "injury" from requirement for US to pay tax refund. But standing is ridiculously arcane area of law.
-
-
@Grange95 But US was agreeing that it SHOULD pay the refund, that the judgment was correct. Hence controversy ended, nothing to appeal. -
@RandomlyBob Lot more complicated than that, but like most legal points, not easily reduced to Twitter post or media sound bite. - 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.