To @grnage95 & others: Would it make sense for PPA to argue "poker players don't wager they pay entry fees" rather than "poker is skill?"
-
-
Replying to @InfiniteEdgeKim
@InfiniteEdgeKim I think it has a role to play, but may sometimes be perceived more as semantics/euphemism than as illustrating its point1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @QuantPoker
@QuantPoker@tamiller866 Hmm. It's often argued that it's the gambling element not "luck" that makes poker illegal. So disprove the former.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InfiniteEdgeKim
@InfiniteEdgeKim@QuantPoker@tamiller866 Key point from Chimento case: In many states, illegal "gambling" includes wagering on skill games.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grange95
@Grange95@InfiniteEdgeKim Yup, in a fair amount it's simply the act of the bet that is the problem.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @InfiniteEdgeKim
@InfiniteEdgeKim@OPReport A tourney fee is a "thing of value" going to a prize pool, distributed based on results of poker. So, illegal.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@InfiniteEdgeKim @OPReport (2/2) Pooling all money to prize pool w/o rake or fee to admin may be legal in some states, illegal in others.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.