Missed this one from @Grange95 a couple of days ago: http://craakker.blogspot.ca/2012/08/united-states-v-dicristina-win-for.html …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @tamiller866
@tamiller866@GamingCounsel I was not aware of that pending case based on the Travel Act. Seems a potentially troubling direction for DOJ.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @tamiller866
@tamiller866 Yeah, the Travel Act is a bit of a thermonuclear prosecutorial weapon. Cc@GamingCounsel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @tamiller866
@tamiller866 Seems to me that@Grange95's analysis is on the money: even if IGBA is out of the picture, there are other fed statutes.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @tamiller866
@tamiller866 Mon dieu! 2+2? I can only imagine the frosty reception for any opinion other than "Poker is a right!" cc@GamingCounsel1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
@tamiller866 Did not know that post hit 2+2. Will need to get drunk then read for entertainment.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.