You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
If a character isn’t straight, I’m happy to play the role provided that we’re not leaning on stereotypes or I’m taking a role away from another actor. Now if I’m asked to tell an LBGTQ+ story, I would decline. We should be showcasing LGBTQ+ talent and amplifying their voices 
https://t.co/C3NzZeRO06
I don't think saving LGBTQ+ roles for LGBTQ+ actors only is the solution to the film industry's homophobia problem. What we truly need is for LGBTQ+ actors to be free to come out without that having negative repercussions on their careers or role availability.
Also, leaving queer roles to queer actors only is actually leaving them to queer actors who are out only. I'm not really comfortable with the idea that an actor who plays a queer character would owe a public coming out, if you see what i mean
I don't think it's the only solution by any means but it's the only solution that Rahul as an actor has his say in
Not quite, though: there's also being the wonderful, empathetic person and outspoken ally he is. People like him, who challenge the status quo, keep learning about other's predicaments, and speak up on behalf of other groups are giving a huge contribution by that already! 
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
