Dual lands. Everyone "just wants to play legacy" and they need dual lands to do it. There are two diverging paths in this argument for me... 1. They can just print "better" dual lands in an ancillary product to make money and bypass this stupid fucking argument. Hexproof, etc...
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
2. The REAL issue is that making Legacy accessible is bad for business. Magic has lasted for so long because power creep ebbs and flows, but is ultimately zero. Wizards NEEDS rotating formats to maintain it's current business model. They're figuring out that Masters sets aren't..
1 odpowiedź 2 podane dalej 7 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
..at all sustainable as a business model. Each subsequent release after MM2 has been a worse seller than the last (with 25 bucking the trend). Wizards can only print "old" cards for so long before they're just printing kindling. "They should adapt" you'll say...
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 5 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
... no you should adapt, OR recognize that this entire game is built on the backs of retailers and event organizers making money selling it. Stores don't run events for games they don't sell. If they do, they aren't stores long...
3 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 3 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Wizards has to produce new content to survive. Stores have to sell new content to continue to support Magic. So why can't Wizards just print more powerful sets? 1. New player acquisition would vanish... Legacy is too complex, it is NOT a starting point...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
2. Designing sets at Legacy power level would break Legacy. Look at cards like Fatal Push, they make WAVES. Imagine 50+ Fatal Push level cards every 3 months, legacy would be trash in no time. 3. Standard and Modern would be cannibalized...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Modern has already cannibalized Standard players. Stores are folding across the country because they're no longer able to make money off Magic with declining player bases and decreased margins competing against online sales. Legacy would redouble that effect...
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek -
W odpowiedzi do @GoingMadlem
Unfortunately, "brick+mortar" is a 20th century business model in a 21st century marketplace.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @JordanMiller406
Most paper magic is still played in brick and mortar and most new players are introduced at brick and mortar. Digital is obviously the future of the game, but entirely irrelevant to RL discussions.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @GoingMadlem
I was just responding to your comment about "folding across the country". This phenomenon isn't unique to Magic and I'm not sure you can attribute it to growth of Modern. Thankfully there are stores that have adapted.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Many of the retailers in my network are adapting "away from Magic" because the money just isn't there anymore. Diversifying out of Magic doesn't help the game of Magic.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.