Let's start with Legacy... "the people's format"... you realize that for 15 years this format was just a joke that people told right? It was made up as a hypothetical retirement village for your old cards to still see play. "Type 1.5" was not something many cared about until...
-
Pokaż ten wątek
-
... SCG resurrected the format to... drumroll please... SELL IRRELEVANT OLD CARDS THAT NOBODY WANTED TO BUY. Your precious dual lands are only worth money because SCG made them worth money. The format only exists in its current form because SCG spent years promoting it.
2 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 8 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Nobody "needs" Black Lotuses (Loti?) to play Magic. Power 9 and a number of cards at that power level were mistakes. They should never be widely available because they are detrimental to the game and should be left in Magic's past... which leaves us with the crux of the RL...
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 8 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
Dual lands. Everyone "just wants to play legacy" and they need dual lands to do it. There are two diverging paths in this argument for me... 1. They can just print "better" dual lands in an ancillary product to make money and bypass this stupid fucking argument. Hexproof, etc...
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 3 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
2. The REAL issue is that making Legacy accessible is bad for business. Magic has lasted for so long because power creep ebbs and flows, but is ultimately zero. Wizards NEEDS rotating formats to maintain it's current business model. They're figuring out that Masters sets aren't..
1 odpowiedź 2 podane dalej 7 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
..at all sustainable as a business model. Each subsequent release after MM2 has been a worse seller than the last (with 25 bucking the trend). Wizards can only print "old" cards for so long before they're just printing kindling. "They should adapt" you'll say...
1 odpowiedź 1 podany dalej 5 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
... no you should adapt, OR recognize that this entire game is built on the backs of retailers and event organizers making money selling it. Stores don't run events for games they don't sell. If they do, they aren't stores long...
3 odpowiedzi 1 podany dalej 3 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Wizards has to produce new content to survive. Stores have to sell new content to continue to support Magic. So why can't Wizards just print more powerful sets? 1. New player acquisition would vanish... Legacy is too complex, it is NOT a starting point...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 6 polubionychPokaż ten wątek -
2. Designing sets at Legacy power level would break Legacy. Look at cards like Fatal Push, they make WAVES. Imagine 50+ Fatal Push level cards every 3 months, legacy would be trash in no time. 3. Standard and Modern would be cannibalized...
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 3 polubionePokaż ten wątek -
Modern has already cannibalized Standard players. Stores are folding across the country because they're no longer able to make money off Magic with declining player bases and decreased margins competing against online sales. Legacy would redouble that effect...
3 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 1 polubionyPokaż ten wątek
... when stores start disappearing, where are you going to play? Online? You already can...
-
-
The problem with this whole discussion is that people feel left out because they're missing on an experience other people get to partake in. "I just want to play Legacy" is a lie. You can play online, and most people don't. "I want to have this thing I don't have" is a truth.
4 odpowiedzi 3 podane dalej 28 polubionychPokaż ten wątekDziękujemy. Twitter skorzysta z tych informacji, aby Twoja oś czasu bardziej Ci odpowiadała. CofnijCofnij
-
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.