GoingMadlem

@BradDavis711 also, see my tweet, I've changed it from a declaration to a hypothesis

@GoingMadlem I guess I put no stock in uninformed opinions and hyperbole. Helps nobody. Discourages thinking. "see I told you's" aren't help

@BradDavis711 uninformed opinion? So if in three months the format hasn't changed much do I retroactively have an informed opinion?

@GoingMadlem Magic cards are good/bad in context. There isn't any context yet, thus your opinion is uninformed.

@BradDavis711 because they've never printed similar cards before ... and its soooo hard to tell whether or not X-1 < X

@GoingMadlem you'e not understanding my point. Prior card are irrelevant. Cards have value in context. Ironclaw Orcs was "good" once.

@BradDavis711 prior cards / formats can give perspective for evaluating current cards ... what's your definition of a "good" card?

@GoingMadlem Your entire original point was that not many new card were played in the tourney. Then snap judgment that the set sucks. (cont)