Nah, old formats need a little instability built in
-
-
W odpowiedzi do @GoingMadlem @meddlingmage
That’s a lot of instability for you to call it “a little instability.” Modern, Legacy, and Vintage literally became different formats after WAR released and a month later they once again were turned on their head with MHO. Eldraine even has a high number of Eternal staples.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 1 polubiony -
-
W odpowiedzi do @GoingMadlem @meddlingmage
When you can’t buff/nerf cards after they’re printed (like what Hearthstone does) and you can only restrict cards in Vintage then there’s only one way to deal with them. WotC should either modernize, learn to face their mistakes, or actually get good at their job.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @MillersSam @meddlingmage
OR, they designed cards to match the power level of the format and they hit the nail on the head. They could spend the next 20 years making (metaphorical) 2 mana lightning bolts, or they can design lightning bolt power spells One sells new cards, one doesn't
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
For every complaint you have about the new cards, there's years of criticism about new cards being weak and older formats growing stale. For every Narset, there's a dozen Questing Beast that have absolutely pushed power levels that won't even be considered in eternal formats
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @GoingMadlem @meddlingmage
Aren’t those both problems? Isn’t the best selling set of all time Battle For Zendikar which isn’t known for its power level but its promos? There are ways to balance this without printing 20-30 Eternal staples per set.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do @MillersSam @meddlingmage
Battle for Zendikar was an absolute dumpster fire for Standard and the singles market... not a better alternative. Modern Horizons necessitated printing staple-level cards. War of the Spark was an anomaly, not the norm. Also, change is good
2 odpowiedzi 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
Change is change. Changing to a worse scenario doesn't get bonus points because it's new. Current cards are playing the game themselves. We dislike this, as it is generally bad for the game's playability. It is fantastic for the game's shareholders. These are not the same.
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych -
W odpowiedzi do to @AnimateZed@GoingMadlem i jeszcze
Like this is so wildly disingenuous its incredible. If you're getting a little bored of the house you live in, you dont set it on fire and go "well, at least it's something new".
1 odpowiedź 0 podanych dalej 0 polubionych
Great analogy, but in this scenario there's only one house so you have to buy new furniture and sometimes it ends up being less comfortable than your old furniture... but you have no way of knowing that until your old furniture is gone.
Wydaje się, że ładowanie zajmuje dużo czasu.
Twitter jest przeciążony lub wystąpił chwilowy problem. Spróbuj ponownie lub sprawdź status Twittera, aby uzyskać więcej informacji.