You're comparing a race issue to a freedom of religion issue. Not the same. Not serving people of different race is wrong but not the same thing as freedom of religion.
-
-
Replying to @Oshbac @walruswax and
And when did religion enter this discussion?
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewcoxXxX @flamebringer555 and
They had no issues to SELL them stuff, the gay couple could have bought everything from the store, the baker just didn’t wanted to bake a special cake for their marriage.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Alice_ShouHiro @AndrewcoxXxX and
Still refused a service for religious reasons. Nothing you can do about it until they amend the Constitution.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Oshbac @AndrewcoxXxX and
It’s their store, so I don’t get why everyone is upset. Especially liberals, it’s not okay to refuse a gay couple a special cake because of religious reasons, but it’s okay to refuse service because of political reasons. Hypocrites!
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @Alice_ShouHiro @AndrewcoxXxX and
Libel isn't a political reason - it's illegal, and the person being slandered can sue. You can call me names, or say you think I'm a moron, and I have no legal recourse. If you accuse me of being a pedophile to an audience of millions and I haven't been convicted of it, I do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GlitchXero @Alice_ShouHiro and
1A does have exceptions. If you yell "fire" in a crowded theater and someone is trampled, 1A will not protect you. Same for libel. It's also against the ToS of pretty much every platform on the internet (including the forums at Infowars, btw).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GlitchXero @Alice_ShouHiro and
You're right though, there is difference: denying a service to a person based on a characteristic that person was born with is unconstitutional, because people have no control over how they were born. The things you say however, (unless you have tourettes) you choose to say.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GlitchXero @Alice_ShouHiro and
Alex Jones -chose- to call the shooting at Sandy Hook a hoax, and if he actually has evidence that it was, why is he not taking it to court? Same with Mueller being pedophile. And a host of other accusations he has made against people with differing political beliefs.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Quite frankly, I'm surprised he wasn't de-platformed sooner. YouTube/Apple/et al allowed him to do this for far longer than they had to (or should have, for that matter.) Even were libel considered protected speech by the constitution, the things you say still have consequences.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.