How much is @adamjohnsonNYC getting paid to write this @sfchronicle? It’s a serious question - what’s the price for ruining your reputation by writing this bs to help @chesaboudin @SFDAOffice ?https://twitter.com/RealJusticePAC/status/1417998324397862912 …
-
-
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
You need to touch grass, desperately. If you honestly think that a couple of videos of shoplifting are more important than rampant, institutional wage theft, or that the DA is somehow responsible for that shoplifting and not incompetent cops, your brain is profoundly broken lol.
2 replies 1 retweet 31 likes -
Replying to @GirlfrendsHaver @adamjohnsonNYC and
Why are you making it mutually exclusive? And why are you assuming it’s just a couple videos?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
Why did you gesture at conspiricism instead of dealing with the substance of the article? Nowhere in that tweet did I make it mutually exclusive, I am giving priority to the problem that adds up to millions of dollars a year in theft from ppl, over a corp insured against theft.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GirlfrendsHaver @adamjohnsonNYC and
I didn’t gesture at conspiricism. It’s about his reputation and the reputation of the chron. That’s where critical reading and reading comp are impt. And retail theft is costing millions of dollars in losses in SF and it’s not as simple as corps being insured against the theft
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GirlfrendsHaver and
The dollar amt is actually the point. The fact that he was paid pennies and then admitted he is an ideologue only shows that he’s a blind partisan advocate (that’s the definition of ideologue) who doesn’t care about his reputation at all bc his POV is dogmatic
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @adamjohnsonNYC and
If you don't think the people/sources pushing the narrative that this is shuttering stores that Target & Walgreens announced they'd be closing months ago are also ideologues, you're mistaken. That's an awfully convenient excuse not to deal with the substance of the article, tho.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GirlfrendsHaver @adamjohnsonNYC and
What I didn’t realize and now do is that Johnson is going to have the same opinion regardless of the facts, the data or the evidence. His opinion is worth the pennies he was paid. And you’re right, he doesn’t care about his reputation. At all.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GirlfrendsHaver and
What you’re missing is that the media, the residents of SF, etc have spent decades dealing w retail theft. They don’t cry wolf. The CJS in SF is progressive. The most progressive in the nation. The idea that this is a couple viral videos and not a real problem is wrong.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @melG679 @GirlfrendsHaver and
And juxtaposing the wage theft to the retail theft is also wrong. His opinion piece showed he has no actual idea about what’s actually happening in SF, day to day, in these stores. And I’m not talking about the corps, I’m talking about the employees and people who shop there
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Pointing out that the 1 video from Walgreens garnered 300 articles in mainstream media while millions of dollars in wage theft got 1 article is a valid criticism to make. He's not writing off the employees or shoppers, he's criticizing the media- almost as if he's a media critic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
from workers.
Last year,