Anglo-Scandinavians' IQs are 107-115, depending on the subgroup. They average us with Scott-Irish (98 IQ) to bring it down.
This is why the Chinese didn't take over the world 1000 years ago. https://twitter.com/NishikiPrestige/status/904778335984562176 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Information structure as evo strat vs. immediate material (e.g. irrigation) as evo strat. As
@curtdoolittle, we weren't the first, but areThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Indo-Europeans arrived into Europe, bringing an evo strat in dynamic, martial evo strat, which generated information structure (science, law
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
arithmetic, which is highly responsive to educational intervention (i.e. practice).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And by the way, East Asians don't have higher IQs than Anglo-Scandinavians, and where they place higher than 'whites' globbed together, it's
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
the fastest. Our common law system rapidly generates information and adapts.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
took over the world and not China more due to differences in timing of relevant variables.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
). It took several thousands of years to generate it, while the Chinese had more of an incentive to just hold their heartland. The West
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, it has more to do with their geographic trap (large heartland resource which encouraged stasis). The West really only began when the
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.