Thus, it is important to not reify science like the autistic libertarian-atheists do, but to understand the actual human interface.
-
-
-
Modeling that interface has intrigued me for a long time. Want to eventually write a book describing meta to replace enlightenment "autism."
-
If I understand what you're meaning, you'd want to study philosophy of language.Following
@Neoabsolutism and Adam at GABlog would be a start -
Thx for recmndtns. Departing from social good by wealth on paper only, taking account of sex, status, culture, aesthetics a part of it.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
You follow Curt, so I know you already know: scientific argumentation is just a higher level evo strat.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Scientific delineation is built through imperfect human language and observation. It is a process and culture of investment in abstraction.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
None of this would be a surprise to those who know the Kuhnian philosophy of science.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.