Did you read the piece? It is unfair and misrepresents the study. @davidludwigmdhttps://medium.com/@davidludwigmd/as-senior-author-of-the-study-id-like-to-correct-a-few-inaccuracies-in-your-post-75743eef4407 …
-
-
Thx, Carrie. I wrote that response on Medium to correct the misrepresentations. I hope the debate can remain factual.
1 reply 3 retweets 15 likes -
I replied on Medium. I was perhaps glib in my original language - my major disagreement is not with the study itself, but with the media coverage that has exploded around it
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Your piece is factually inaccurate & harmful to the T1 community. If you or your child lived for a day with the struggles of Type 1 you would realize what a ray of hope publicity for this treatment strategy is. More studies YES. 1000s doing already w/o help from healthcare team.
4 replies 5 retweets 17 likes -
Which part of my piece is factually inaccurate?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@davidludwigmd covered it very well in his response. Your title however is particularly problematic. A cure was never suggested & you making light of it at the expense of the T1 community to make your point is tone deaf.1 reply 3 retweets 12 likes -
There were any number of news pieces that suggested very strongly that a cure had been demonstrated. As to offense, I certainly didn't mean to poke fun at people with diabetes. I did also respond to
@davidludwigmd on Medium4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
There will always be an issue with misinterpretation in the media. But let’s not fight misinformation with more misinformation. An honest scholarly debate is welcome and needed, as no study in nutrition can ever be the final word.
2 replies 6 retweets 18 likes -
As I said, I look forward to the clinical trials. You've got some fascinating results there
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @davidludwigmd and
you've seen the difference in the CGM results, is it ethical to do an RCT?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
So far, there are results from a sample biased in innumerable ways. The entire point of an RCT is to see if these are true results, or simply the result of selecting a population of likely responders from an already-biased population of people for whom the diet worked
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @davidludwigmd and
I'm aware of that and my question still stands. A shorter term trial, months, incorporating a crossover design, with the goal of gauging the distribution and width of responses, would minimise ethical concerns.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @_eleanorina @davidludwigmd and
I imagine the first step would be a short term feasibility trial, probably not randomized, followed by a full scale rct
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.