Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GidMK's profile
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Verified account
@GidMK

Tweets

Health NerdVerified account

@GidMK

Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Sydney, New South Wales
theguardian.com/profile/gideon…
Joined November 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      This could have all been fixed with a control group. It was an online survey, so presumably not hard to include a control Weird that they didn't, isn't it?

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Show this thread
    2. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      A control group - say, T1 diabetes by on a different diet - would give us some information about whether it's the diet itself making these changes or just people's bad reporting

      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      Show this thread
    3. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      This statement of limitations is ~woefully inadequate~ for a biased online survey of 300 people...pic.twitter.com/KLq7aLKy5A

      1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
      Show this thread
    4. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      And this conclusion is...stunning. To paraphrase: "If a big number of future studies are done that agree with ours, we can conclude that this study was right"pic.twitter.com/VrBeEuOegv

      1 reply 1 retweet 5 likes
      Show this thread
    5. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      That's like me saying that you should use a pill because eventually we'll find that it works As I said, stunning

      1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
      Show this thread
    6. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      This comic from PhD comics springs to mind...pic.twitter.com/RJyax9gDJG

      1 reply 4 retweets 6 likes
      Show this thread
    7. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      If THE AUTHORS OF THE STUDY didn't draw a single firm conclusion from their research - which they didn't - why would anyone else?

      1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes
      Show this thread
    8. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      And this quote from the @nytimes sums it up for me Maybe the control seems to good to be true...because it is?pic.twitter.com/50sGkrgXNH

      1 reply 1 retweet 1 like
      Show this thread
    9. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      Essentially, this was an online survey that proved nothing whatsoever, and had results that were almost certainly too good to be true

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
      Show this thread
    10. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      And yet, every single news source quoted the authors who said that this diet demonstrated "exceptional" glucose control

      1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes
      Show this thread
      Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018

      The only thing "exceptional" about this research is that people have read more into it than "interesting but needs more research"

      8:26 PM - 7 May 2018
      • 4 Likes
      • Sarah Jane RN(C) BSN Alastair McAlpine, MD Merridew Renfield's Afoot💙Vaccinate.
      2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
        1. This Tweet is unavailable.
        2. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018
          Replying to @MusclebrainCSCS

          You should do a survey of people in a Facebook group who all agree with you then publish it as if it's a scientific study 😂😂

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. Show replies
        1. New conversation
        2. Holly Witteman, PhD‏ @hwitteman 8 May 2018
          Replying to @GidMK

          Holly Witteman, PhD Retweeted Holly Witteman, PhD

          I generally agree with you about the limitations (my thread about this here: https://twitter.com/hwitteman/status/993659878039261184 …). My view on the Facebook group is that it’s just another way to do snowball sampling. I’m not sure why it deserves particular censure?

          Holly Witteman, PhD added,

          Holly Witteman, PhD @hwitteman
          Very interesting results. Great to see an observational study of this. Would love to see trials, especially factorial hi/med/lo carb x closed loop/no closed loop (or possibly CGM/no CGM). https://twitter.com/anahadoconnor/status/993344628043612160 …
          Show this thread
          1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
        3. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 8 May 2018
          Replying to @hwitteman

          For a qualitative sample I'd be on the same page but it strikes me as a very poor strategy to get a sample for a quantitative piece of work

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info