I have ~far more~ professionals agreeing with me, they just don't jump into my mentions to do so lol. I'm also not going to do my own review of the evidence, I think the NHMRC has that pretty well covered and I don't have 2 years' of my life to dedicate to it anyway!
But SR/MA both include many forms of evidence, generally. I'm doing an SR at the moment that incorporates RCT/cohort/qual evidence
-
-
Also, the NHMRC definitely looked at evidence outside of this in their review. I'm confused by that statement
-
A SR of observational studies would only achieve a Level B/C evidence bc of the hierarchy we subscribe to. So really - its the hierarchy we subscribe to that I am saying "is not the only way to science" -
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
is NOT science. The public deserves far better. Health professionals deserve better too. Bc we have and do trust "NHMRC/DAA" and I am saying, I did too, but now, well, I think the public are right to be a little outraged here.