Saying that something is politically expedient is different from saying “disagreement is a person ‘ignoring science’”.
CoI is obviously an important component of bias, but I'd disagree that it's the be-all-end-all you're suggesting wrt scientific evidence
-
-
...if we only took level A evidence - what would the ADG look like? As Indigo suggests, this is people's lives here, we owe it to the public to be very discerning!! DBRCT/RCT/SR/MA are only ONE PART of the science of what to eat to achieve health. We've made it the ONLY part.
-
That
is NOT science. The public deserves far better. Health professionals deserve better too. Bc we have and do trust "NHMRC/DAA" and I am saying, I did too, but now, well, I think the public are right to be a little outraged here. - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
