Skip to content
By using Twitter’s services you agree to our Cookies Use. We and our partners operate globally and use cookies, including for analytics, personalisation, and ads.
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • About

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
GidMK's profile
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Health Nerd
Verified account
@GidMK

Tweets

Health NerdVerified account

@GidMK

Epidemiologist. Writer (Guardian, Observer etc). "Well known research trouble-maker". PhDing at @UoW Host of @senscipod Email gidmk.healthnerd@gmail.com he/him

Sydney, New South Wales
theguardian.com/profile/gideon…
Joined November 2015

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018
      Replying to @akmcintyre

      Well then maybe we should take a second look at that uncontrolled, non-blinded, statistically problematic, weirdly done, fairly obviously biased, definitely not in any way proof of ketosis virta study that you're taking as absolute positive proof that ketosis is effective 😉

      4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
    2. Andrew McIntyre‏ @akmcintyre 7 May 2018
      Replying to @GidMK

      That is one of many clinical studies, many of which are RCTs, which are much more reliable than weak associations. Its not that epidemiology is unimportant, but it needs to be tested and there are weaknesses. Do you disagree with this article?pic.twitter.com/fYtPc2x6JI

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    3. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018
      Replying to @akmcintyre

      I just find it funny that you're happy to rubbish a massive NHMRC-funded review of the evidence, but cheerfully accept at face-value a non-randomized enormously biased industry-funded study and then tell me it's because epidemiology is broken

      4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
    4. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @akmcintyre

      Gid, you know that the first “ADGs in Australia” were a 3-way folded pamphlet with not a single reference within cooee?pic.twitter.com/jTdEs1EZQr

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    5. Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018
      Replying to @WeDietitians @akmcintyre

      Nope! I love health history, it's fascinating

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    6. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
      Replying to @GidMK @akmcintyre

      Same. And “our history” is little known within the profession too. As Mooney (2007) suggests, to know how to do better, we first need to understand what it is we do well. Requires an historical context (analysis) 🤓

      1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
    7. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
      Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK @akmcintyre

      So @GidMK reason for telling you this bit of history is bc your article says "Overall, the guidelines are based on literally hundreds of individual pieces of scientific research, representing the perspectives of millions of people"....well, the "evidence" came after-the-fact.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    8. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
      Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK @akmcintyre

      And "literally hundreds" is ~1,100, and includes industry-funded studies, and, prev work by @foodnuthealth did uncover some "double-ups". I'm really perplexed by the "representing perspective of millions of people"??

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
    9. Leonie  🍽️ 🥣‏ @leoniee54 7 May 2018
      Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK and

      Where does the figure 1100 come from? Don’t ADG refer to NRVs, wh refer to WHO data, wh refer to global research? For each nutrient reference base is huge.

      1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
    10. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
      Replying to @leoniee54 @GidMK and

      I counted them, I was closer to 900, but @DrDuaneRD quoted 1,100 in his piece for TC. I counted bc I too was spurting for years the "based on over 55k scientific papers"...flicked thru hard copy on desk "hey, those numbers aren't even close to 55k" https://theconversation.com/dietary-guidelines-dont-work-heres-how-to-fix-them-68803 …

      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
      Health Nerd‏Verified account @GidMK 7 May 2018
      Replying to @WeDietitians @leoniee54 and

      I think the 55k was for the number of abstracts reviewed, not the number of studies included in the final document

      6:10 PM - 7 May 2018
      2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        1. New conversation
        2. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
          Replying to @GidMK @leoniee54 and

          The statement being bandied around was "Best available scientific evidence based on over 55k scientific papers".... It is only those of us who have done SR+MA who might realise the 55k refers to the "first pass lit search"...but for most people, it sounds legit and robust?

          2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. We Dietitians‏ @WeDietitians 7 May 2018
          Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK and

          So - as a public statement, and was "popped in" almost every DAA media release leading up to and following the GL release - so we were all saying it without thinking. It is a "misrepresentation", a "headline" the very thing you rally against in your blogs?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        4. Show replies
        1. Food Nut‏ @foodnuthealth 7 May 2018
          Replying to @GidMK @WeDietitians and

          May not even been abstracts reviewed, may just have been titles. Have you tried replicating the search strategy?

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info