I did pop a link to my [only] blog on the ADG in our conversation at the end of last week https://ecodietitians.com.au/2017/11/23/bringing-in-the-guidelines-the-story-so-far/ … that covers the origins and when "the science" came in.
True fact. Fortunately the guidelines are both politically expedient and based on robust scientific evidence 
-
-
You have many professionals disagreeing with you on the latter point, and have not engaged on the history of DG (evidence against robustness), instead relying on the NHMRC to do the review, and then shifting the goalposts to say that it's politically expedient for public policy.
-
I am 100% with you on increasing accessibility and changing the structural problems in food systems. I'm also staunchly anti-DG. There is a lot of heterogeneity in opinion and nuance in disagreement. When "ignoring science" is used as a weapon, conversation becomes impossible.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.