It is conceit if you overvalue the conclusions beyond there proper place. Its best not to say things you know to be false.
I'm mostly talking about the 2013 guidelines. I mean, a lot of public health policy was originally based on little/no evidence (i.e. plain packaging)
-
-
Not sure that the 2013 ADG, or earlier versions, are based on evidence. For example, some benefits of oats extrapolated to apply to other grains; similar situation for soy applied to other legumes. Assumptions that evidence from earlier ADGs correct & didn’t need reviewing.
-
Another one was the “saturated fat-chol-CVD” link - the 2013 version not only didn’t review bc “established evidence” but decided no evidence level was needed in making the statement.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

