There were at least 3 people today who told me that epidemiology is junk science and that you can't prove anything with epidemiological studies Me, an epidemiologist: uh, well, that's not really how it works https://twitter.com/polumechanos/status/993156108062724096 …
-
-
1. I don't. There are multiple other RCTs, including one from the CSIRO that show similar benefits. Its confirmatory, that's for sure. 2. Nutritional Epidemiology has not been/will not be able to establish causation and RCT evidence is against the guidelines being totally correct
-
1. You've cited it as definitive evidence to me at least 3 times now 2. Guidelines can never be "totally correct" that's not my position I'd suggest you read the op-ed
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Gid, you know that the first “ADGs in Australia” were a 3-way folded pamphlet with not a single reference within cooee?pic.twitter.com/jTdEs1EZQr
-
Nope! I love health history, it's fascinating
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
The amount of money spent on anything does not confer quality. That goes for the NHMRC and doubly Kellogg's pay for research. Exhibit A. My pinned tweet. Any comments?https://twitter.com/MacroFour/status/911511931285946369 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Epidemiology IS broken. How else do you explain 30 years of increasingly poor health , obesity and metabolic illness. It is not because the entire world had a sudden attack of lethargy. Its because the entire world has been merrily trundling down the wrong path.
-
Before you get to say epidemiology is broken, you have to understand the science and maths that go into it. Show us your credentials, or go away.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
