No it’s not buddy
-
-
Replying to @tissa38 @carriefellner and
According to the EPA it is. Check up the thread
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @carriefellner and
Look at the latest literature. Anyway, I’ll keep advocating and fighting for the victims of these insidious chemicals, who never chose to be continually exposed and you can keep advocating for whoever it is you’re advocating for. Have a great day.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tissa38 @carriefellner and
Lol. The EPA calculations were done in 2016. If you've got anything more recent happy to take a look
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @carriefellner and
Also check out the submissions to the Australian Federal Govt expert panel on PFOS from 2018
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tissa38 @carriefellner and
You mean the 2017 Italian ecological study that specifically and explicitly says that it's not evidence of a causal link? Or the other two sources that use the EPA reference RfD or similar? I mean...it seems that they agree with my argument
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @carriefellner and
I’ll tell you what, you start giving your kids water laced with PFAS at the same levels as what’s been detected in Bundaberg’s drinking water, and in 5 years time I’ll ask you again if you still have the same lack of concern
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @tissa38 @carriefellner and
Every child in Australia is likely drinking similar levels of PFAS this is actually explicitly recognized in the 2018 consultation panel so...sure? I guess?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
As for the asbestos argument: do an epidemiology course and get back to me. A single ecological study that concludes "need more research to establish a casual link" does not a fulsome argument makepic.twitter.com/z2XQkhW7Hd
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @carriefellner and
We’ll come and visit the 1 firefighter recruit course from Fiskville where 9 out of 14 recruits all had children with severe birth defects, then ask them about your lack of concern. Back to your next groundbreaking, money making thesis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yes, yes, occupational exposure to things can cause problems and that still has nothing whatsoever to do with the subject at hand. And accusing me of making money off this is, again, ridiculous. I'm employed by the govt, I make no money either way
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.