Just to check: are you implying that I have a financial interest in PFAS/PFOS? Because that seems remarkably stupid
None of this conversation has been about occupational exposure. Check up the thread it's about levels in drinking water
-
-
Which relate also to NOEL in humans who are continually exposed. Why have guidelines and levels, which are continually being lowered, if people like you then say are irrelevant. I assume you can provide all of your peer reviewed literature to support your hypothesis?
-
Excluding the now debunked research funded by Dupont and 3M. You know, the research that the US Supreme Court referred to as being deliberately misleading.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.