That doesn't change the fact that we have national standards, and the level that was detected was twice that standard. If you're advocating for a change to the standards, that's a separate matter, but doesn't change the specifics of that announcement.
Lol. Well, obviously everything has adverse effects at some level. But the evidence suggests very strongly that at double the DoH reference level there'd be none
-
-
Look harder mate, plenty of peer reviewed studies suggest otherwise. As a starter, look at the C8 panel studies, or grandjean et al, or the latest Italian study or the German HBMI values, the list goes on, or the Fiskville Inquiry findings.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
2012 the C8 Science Panel in the US found a ‘probable Link’ to the following diseases, Testicular Cancer, Prostrate Cancer, Kidney Cancer, Thyroid Disease, Ulcerative Colitis, high cholesterol and pregnancy-induced hypertension, kidney failure, miscarriage and birth defects.
-
Most of the evidence in those reports appears to have been considered by the EPA when setting their RfD. And the DoH reference range is orders of magnitude lower than even that
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.