The timing of this announcement is a disgracepic.twitter.com/BJYFKBEZNR
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
But that document is based on exposure above .07. Given the chemicals are bioaccumulative and have very long half lives, I fail to see how daily exposure to double the safe level could be viewed as "conservative".
The reference value isn't the 'safe' value per se, it's just the amount that the DoH categorizes as worth investigation. Also, the RfD from the EPA paper is 1.5micrograms/day for an avg person, which would mean drinking some 100 litres at the concentration found above
And just recently New Jersey lowered their drinking water standard to 14 ppt from 70ppt. US EPA have just labeled PFOS as a “known reproductive toxin.”
And don’t forget 3M’s own evidence to the Aust Fed Senate Inquiry where they said PFAS “probably causes various cancers, more probably than not”. But hey, let’s listen to the ‘experts that are not effected or have a financial interest is saying ‘nothing to see here’
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.