Why biohacking is just another marketing term like 'superfood' FYI @TheSciBabe @DrRachie @DrRobertOConnor @CaulfieldTim @pash22 @welovegv @Takethatdoctors @NaturoDiaries @DrJessBerentson @BethSkw @picardonhealth @matthewherper @CaraSantaMariahttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/975481638862901250 …
And then you have the obvious issue of computer nerds trying to do medicine, with stuff like "take hormones+SSRIs+cocaine but at a low dose it's good for you" the insane result
-
-
Yeah, a lot of marketing bullshit among the "mage" crowd. Not sure that the word has the same function among DIYers
-
Yeh that's why I wanted to split them up. The rogues are mostly just scientists who have no respect for regulation, which is stupid but understandable. The mages are basically alt med practitioners who like to use a different word
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Before I was a writer I was in bioinformatics, and let me tell you there are SO MANY computer nerds who assume at first that biology is as logical as computers and thus fixing bugs/creating features is just a matter of throwing time and energy at a problem.
-
I wonder if the tech world would think fixing every non-computer problem was so easy if it wasn't composed of ~70% white men
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.