Here's the problem: This decisions was made with harm minimisation in mind. Evidence clearly shows that RTPM, increased resources for pain, & increased resources for addiction needed. This move removes one, increases access to opioids/harm, & ignores resourcing
-
-
-
But surely that isn't an argument against this policy per se, but more about our moralistic attitude to addiction in general?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.