Except, this is an observational questionnaire subject to all sorts of bias and the numbers weren't that bad anyway
-
-
Show this thread
-
I reckon you could ask the same questions and get the same answers if you asked about coffee instead. It's all contextual
Show this thread -
There's no reason (as far as I know) why an energy drink would be more harmful than a sugary coffee from Starbucks. The only added stuff - like taurine - doesn't do anything anyway
Show this thread -
I mean, even if this study is true, the claim that "Energy drinks are triggering side effects in 50% of kids" is wildly misleading because they asked about side effects EVER not every time
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.