-
-
Replying to @coopesdetat @GidMK
Good grief. The comments alone are scaring me. I will take a look at it. Thank you for calling it to my attention.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
The OP giving me a paternalistic rap for daring to question him, which always bodes well
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @GidMK @coopesdetat
@GidMK Can you postpone the wedding? We have analyses to do.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Look, I selfishly thought the same thing
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @coopesdetat @GidMK
Wait this is 2007. Why is he raising it now?
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Gee I wonder. Could he have an agenda? Now, why would I think that
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @coopesdetat @Karkazis
So, had a quick read of this 51-page nightmare. TL:DR - literally the authors' conclusionpic.twitter.com/w4I1TT1fo1
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Basically, it's a decade-old review of literature that concluded that differences are a varied mixture of societal expectation and biology
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
And in my opinion, this review contradicts Damore's idiocy very profoundly as it demonstrates the complexity of the issue of sex differences
-
-
To put it another way, they guy tweeting about it is incorrectly quoting his own research. Which is...interesting
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
It's basically a fan letter to Damore written on the back of a contradictory manuscript
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.