This is a very good point. It raises the question of whether any of that $122 million is going towards addressing sampling bias https://twitter.com/oz_f/status/894780836314087425 …
Basically, if the planned postal plebiscite goes ahead without a huge investment in marketing for young people, it's a complete sham
-
-
But even if they invest massively in marketing to young people, their sample is still going to be skewedhttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/894782971504336896 …
-
Young people are more likely to not have fixed addresses, for example. Hard to be part of a postal plebiscite with no fixed address
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.