This is a very good point. It raises the question of whether any of that $122 million is going towards addressing sampling bias https://twitter.com/oz_f/status/894780836314087425 …
The issue here is that any expense increases the cost of the (already expensive) postal time-wastage
-
-
Also, the government doesn't WANT young people to vote more, because then the results will almost certainly be pro
#MarriageEquality -
Basically, if the planned postal plebiscite goes ahead without a huge investment in marketing for young people, it's a complete sham
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.