For example, right now my team is working on a large dataset of diabetes tests. It's not "my research", we are all contributing
-
-
-
-
Replying to @GidMK
The absoluteness of the statement. Is all. Not the sentiment.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WeDietitians
Fair enough. Perhaps if it's only applied to research? Most people don't talk about their work as "my research" anyway!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
Interestingly, in PhD land (context dependent) noted encouragement to own that work as "my". It's uncomfortable, bc so much comes before us
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WeDietitians
That's really odd to me, if only because you base any work on hundreds of studies that you reference
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK
I guess thats the acknowledgement, what has come before you to justify what new piece you are bringing because of "everyone's work to date"
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK
The premise of a PhD is for an individual to "make a unique contribution to the body of evidence" so in some ways its a self-indulgence
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK
Just between you and me...as a side note...some collaborations are on paper only, to get the $ ..totally dysfunctional in real-life...
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Oh absolutely. And some are political, some are convenient etc. But I've never done research on my own in the sense that some people mean
-
-
-
Replying to @WeDietitians @GidMK
Turns out there's a legal aspect to this - and "collaboration" is implied if you even use the uni microscope! Context: IP and who owns
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.