The confusion of "liberals" with "people who care about epistemic norms" isn't good look, John.https://twitter.com/jpodhoretz/status/858466067164909568 …
-
-
Replying to @AlanLevinovitz
You can think Stephens is being intellectually dishonest and still think critics are being over the top.
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @matthewherper
Absolutely. I think the "unsubscribers" are crazy, tbh. But outrage over the article was abt intellectual dishonesty, not "liberals". 1/2
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @AlanLevinovitz @matthewherper
I think it's dangerous to link a legit critique of a position to political bias, b/c it allows ppl to dismiss anything as politics. 2/2
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlanLevinovitz @matthewherper
From what I've seen it's a common tactic in the US; label something as 'political' and ignore the evidence
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
It happens elsewhere, but I think it's particularly effective in the US with the dual-party system
7:57 PM - 30 Apr 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.