This is a great example of scientific denialism, mixed in with a bit of Dunning-Kruger for good measurehttps://twitter.com/HeatherxWhite/status/858807313007878145 …
But this 'flaw' doesn't make sense; if there was an effect at low exposure you'd expect to see a BIGGER effect using only high exposure
-
-
But most importantly, MINOR ISSUES WITH A STUDY DO NOT MAKE IT WORTHLESShttps://twitter.com/GidMK/status/858822688118259712 …
-
You see this all the time with science deniers; they find one source of potential bias and start arguing that the study is trash
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.