But @auspost is already a source of net revenue for the govt, so technically he is paying the tax payer!
For everyone who is mad about the Australia Post CEO salary; why do you think this is unusual? It's probably comparable to a private salary.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd also be interested to see an economic analysis, but still wouldn't mean that the CEO is being overpaid
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Seems like you're arguing that all taxation is morally fraught there
-
That's it — if we accept the enforcement of wealth distribution by coercion then we ought to be careful about why/when/how
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Seems like a very arbitrary distinction to me
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't even remotely agree with your taxation premise, but regardless I think we do agree on the Auspost salary!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The overwhelming majority of tax is collected through non-coercive means
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You are presupposing that people wouldn't pay tax if they didn't have to, i.e. they only support govt bc of laws
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'd say the fact that the country consistently votes in govts that approve taxation indicates the popular opinion quite well
-
There are at least 2 political parties that oppose all tax and they garner what, 3% of the vote?
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.