Sugar tax isn't a sign of the nanny state: it's a step in the right direction http://www.smh.com.au/comment/sugar-tax-isnt-a-sign-of-the-nanny-state-its-a-step-in-the-right-direction-20161122-gsun3c.html … via @smh
I'm not against a restriction on advertising, but I suspect a sugar tax will be far more cost-effective
-
-
where will it end? I can't eat "healthy" foods (as I have to have a low fibre diet due to health condition) - will I eventually get
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
slugged because the government says I shouldn't be eating white rice, pasta and low fibre-less cereal?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it just feels like the thin end of a very big (and controlling) wedge to me... JMHO :)
-
I'm not a fan of slippery slope arguments; it's always possible, but each step faces the same scrutiny as before...
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.