surely the first step is ban advertising? (should do same with gambling IMHO) Why is the answer always that people should pay more?
Sugar tax isn't a sign of the nanny state: it's a step in the right direction http://www.smh.com.au/comment/sugar-tax-isnt-a-sign-of-the-nanny-state-its-a-step-in-the-right-direction-20161122-gsun3c.html … via @smh
-
-
-
I'm not against a restriction on advertising, but I suspect a sugar tax will be far more cost-effective
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
non-adversarial ? where would sugar appear on this chart in your opinionhttps://twitter.com/julianbuchanan/status/800898003015847936 …
-
It's a somewhat different problem, so I don't think it would fit on the graph per se
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.