.@EMcCra2 @pHarmaNemesis Even if that was true, how does it justify terrorising an innocent bystander?
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
.@EMcCra2
@pHarmaNemesis They found an innocent bystander and started a terror campaign against him. You can't justify that.5 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @PharmaNemesis
.
@pHarmaNemesis @EMcCra2 Evidence, not-a-Dr, I know you pro-diseasers don't like it, but you need to show it.2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Vbalance03
.@EMcCra2
@pHarmaNemesis There is no evidence, that's the whole point. Pro-diseasers attacked an innocent man.3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GeoffSchuler @PharmaNemesis
They had some difficulty differentiating between the letter "n" and "y" http://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-11-07/peter-tiernan/8001532 …
5 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
You haven't heard of the ABC?
10:51 AM - 8 Nov 2016
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.