David Katz: Paid junk-food apologist https://therussells.crossfit.com/2016/09/26/david-katz-junk-foods-slyest-defender/ …
-
-
Replying to @CrossFit
@DunkTheJunkFood This article is rife with inaccuracies and quote mines. You should perhaps read some of Katz's many articles.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
I wrote it. If there are any inaccuracies, please comment or email. I will correct them immediately.
@GidMK@CrossFit@DunkTheJunkFood3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
The statement that sugar in fruit juice comes in lower concentrations than coke is incorrect.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @GreenPlusAnE and
Similarly, most fruit juice has a very similar amount of fibre to coke.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK
Thank you. I said fruit, not fruit juice, though.
@GidMK@CrossFit@DunkTheJunkFood1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
The implication was clearly towards juice, so perhaps misleading rather than inaccurate.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @GreenPlusAnE and
A number of times you reduce a long, nuanced argument to a single soundbite. Again, misleading.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GidMK @GreenPlusAnE and
For example, industry-funded research; it's not the black-and-white scenario you try to paint it as
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
what specific statement of mine paints it wrongly as black and white?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
You imply throughout that any funding received from an industry source forever taints research
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.