But all related to the crash, and an RCT wouldn't help to identify them. It's not what RCTs are for, that's the point.
I don't think anyone has lied. I think that there are 1000s of factors that you haven't controlled for.
-
-
Your evidence is essentially a study, just one done without any control whatsoever.
-
It's a different question. Yours is: Is the risk of Chantix low enough to be acceptable? RCTs+observational good for that.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If I say, e.g., using an ecig made me stop smoking, I have identified causality with 100% certainty. Same with Chantix.
-
So you were locked in a room with literally no other inputs for the entire time you quit smoking?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.