Wilyman demands evidence why chapters in her thesis aren't compelling. #selfevident @kloussikian
-
-
Just started reading chapters 7 and 8. She starts with the "vaccines don't prevent disease" gambit :(
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @VaccineUK @jc_bigears and
Hooray, the "it's listed on the package insert" gambit. 10 points!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VaccineUK @jc_bigears and
Finally, her first bit of evidence is: Gallagher and Goodman 2010! https://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/09/17/another-weak-study-proves-vaccines-cause-autism/ … Giving up there
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @VaccineUK @jc_bigears and
I did keep going to end of chap 8. Gallagher/Goodman is her ONLY citation supporting autism/vaccine link
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @VaccineUK @jc_bigears and
She cites the WHO a number of times as a source on vax 'harm'. Incorrectly, of course. Shameful
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GidMK @jc_bigears and
I like how she cites "Vaccine Epidemic" but ignores Cochrane reviews except to diss flu vaccine
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
In a thesis of vaccines she cites 2 since outdated systematic reviews. It's hilarious.
-
-
Replying to @GidMK @jc_bigears and
But only one of them used in main text. Plus several unverified references to "Jefferson 2008"
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.