I disagree. The null hypothesis is always no benefit until on has been shown, otherwise your reasoning is on shaky grounds.
If there is no difference from placebo, then in all likelihood cupping is not causing the pain reduction.
-
-
Potentially something in the provider-patient experience could be reducing pain, but that can be achieved without cupping.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
it's really fascinating to identify where the logic disconnects here: we know so little about pain reduction, the placebo 1/2
-
could be a treatment. Especially when considering appropriate/similar placebos. Could be cupping doesn't work or placebo does too.2/2
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.